Soon Halt and his team stumbled across what they thought to be a landing site of some sort. Sgt. Ball recalls significant details about the way the branches had been snapped,
"it didn't take us long to find what we thought to be a landing site of some sort. The trees had branches broken off. As we looked up, we had high power flashlights with us, we could see branches, up to an inch, two inches in diameter had either been knocked completely off or had been bent downward. It was clean up to the top of the trees."
There were three indentations which all looked identical, there were also broken branches high up in the tree-tops, along with scuff marks near the lower parts of the trees. It is not really clear whether Halt had discovered another landing site or had just revisited the one which Jim Penniston found - although new information on this subject was revealed in Sci-Fi Channel's "UFO Invasion at Rendlesham". Halt led Penniston and Bryant Gumbel (presenter) to the location of the landing site, Penniston said that the landing site he had found was in the opposite direction (both were involved on different nights) because of this it seems that Halt had indeed found a new landing site.
Halt made this clear in the "UFO invasion at Rendlesham" documentary:
"[it was] obviously on different nights... two different things, or the same thing came back..."
The live tape gives us a good idea of what was happening at this point, Sgt. Nevilles was operating the geiger counter; which was an AN PDR-27F.
Lt. Colonel Halt: We are getting readings on the tree. You're taking samples from on the side facing the suspected landing site?
Lt. Englund: Four clicks max.
Lt. Colonel Halt: Up to four. Interesting. That's right where you're taking the sample now.
Lt. Englund: Four
Lt. Colonel Halt: That's the strongest point on the tree?
Sgt. Nevilles: Yes sir, and if you come to the back, there's no clicks whatsoever.
Lt. Colonel Halt: No clicks at all, in the back
Sgt. Nevilles: Maybe one or two
Lt. Colonel Halt: It's all on the side facing the [landing site obviously]...interesting.
This shows us that the levels of radiation were greater in the landing site than they were only a few metres away, regardless of the levels of radiation (which were not harmful) it is still important that the levels peaked in the landing site. Colonel Halt's last comment is also very important, the radiation was all on the side of the tree facing into the landing site; there was none on the back of the tree. I have been informed that 0.01 'milliroentgens' would be a neutral/normal amount of radiation.
Meanwhile, Adrian Bustinza had been sent back to RAF Woodbridge to finally sort out those light-alls. He would return to Rendlesham Forest later on during the night.
As I have already said, there were broken branches and damaged trees around the landing site; Nevilles confirms this: "It was almost as though a small object had sat down with the 3 tripods, come down on the ground. And the unique thing was, the pressure on each one of those tripods had been pressed down into the ground with the same weight." The men had not moved very far in the last few minutes, as they were examining the landing site. All of a sudden the animals on a nearby farm went into a 'frenzy'; it appears that something had disturbed or frightened them.
Halt confirms the strange noises coming from the nearby farmhouses, "At one point all the farmer's animals, the pigs, the cows, the chickens and everything were all 'acking up...Making an awful lot of noise as though they were being disturbed or frightened." What was happening?
Source: unexplored-earth.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment