Credit: fromatlantistosphinx.blogspot.com
Friday, December 5, 2014
Credit: fromatlantistosphinx.blogspot.com
Origin: we-are-believe.blogspot.com
The story is running on my local newspaper web site as one of its top stories. I don't want to send
the pictures because of copy write and fear of them falling in to the wrong hands but you can see them on the English web site:
Derbyshire times web site. The pictures when blown up show clearly a ufo of metallic shape about as big as a house in the distance and strange emissions
and a bright light from within also there is a shadow on the clouds. The picture was took on a cell phone camera in day light also the picture of the aliens is clear.
The strange forms are clearly seen floating in the trees and can be seen with faces eyes mouths and limbs and have a a floating device with them.
You interested you should be because I personally think they are the best images ever recorded.
Contact me by email after you have looked on the web site. The pictures when blown up categorically show some thing never seen before.
I swear they are real pictures that have not been concocted by any way other than they are genuine. I have a story to tell about my encounters in
this ufo hot spot. yours John Wignell tel 07530789769. or email.john.wignell@live.co.uk
The pictures when blow up clearly shows a ufo and the alien picture took some several months ago does also. the pictures on the web site
will not magnify to clear blowups but the ones in my camera do. They are in my opinion the best clearest evidence that we are not alone.
Credit: mysteries-and-strangeness.blogspot.com
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
While laying down on a trampoline looking directly to the sky my son and I noticed the formation of the ufos. While observing they moved in a direction several times opposite the wind direction in a clear blue sky. At the point they left during the 20 minutes of hovering and movement they took off faster than we have ever seen any jet plane and in multiple directions.
2013 SIGHTING REPORT
(via MUFON.com)
Learn about: an amazing NASA UFO Sighting Video and Blatant Cover-Up.Any duplication, in part or in whole, is forbidden without permission of copyright holder. Email Site Admin for inquiries, comments or questions.
Origin: aliens-are-friends.blogspot.com
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
As luck would have it, I just stumbled across the following caveat while perusing a writer's style and reference book: "If you are writing for a general audience...and you use the term "nukes", some readers...may be irritated by what they see as a frivolous reference to a dealy serious subject."
I think that is what bothered me most; it seemed a cheesy title for a book that aimed to examine intelligently these connections the author posits. His work, while often flawed, is smartly written and he certainly had done his homework. However, once more the bane of UFOlogy rears its head in an over-reliance on anecdotal "evidence" and presumption.
Hastings writes in an article entitled "A Shot Across The Bow: Another Look At The Big Sur Incident" that "Following the dramatic incident (according to witness, then Lt. Bob Jacobs) a 16-mm version of the amazing film was shown to a small, select group at Vandenberg. Immediately thereafter, the crucial frames were cut out and quickly confiscated by two "government agents"-possibly working for the CIA-who had been among those in attendance." Jacobs said that while in the meeting, his superior commanded him to keep quiet about what had been captured on the film, emphasizing that it did not happen.
Herein lie several of the pitfalls facing UFO research today. While never overbearing, words like "amazing", "select group", "immediately", "crucial", and "quickly confiscated" paint an image of a wondrous event that was capriciously snatched from humanity by sinister "government agents". This brings me to my second concern: presumption. Jacobs, according to Hastings, described these men as possible CIA agents, but provides no evidence to that effect. In fact, in Jacobs' own words (here), he left that meeting without ever knowing who those men were. He also left that meeting before they did, so how can he know they took the film-if indeed any such film existed? In point of fact, I'm not sure we can be assured any such meeting took place.
Some years later, Jacobs broke his silence and sold his story to the "National Enquirer". It is only well after the fact, that he came to several spurious conclusions, including his belief that the entire missile tracking test was a cover for UFO activity that would later evolve into the Reagan-era "Star Wars "program.
Those who criticize Jacobs' story dug deep into military archives, coming up empty-handed on any documentation to support his claims. This is easily refuted by Jacobs and proponents like Hastings as proof of a government conspiracy. But the logical fallacy this presents is too rudimentary to even examine. Suffice it to say that if a man claims to have invented water, and his skeptics say "well, we can't find any proof of that". That man would be a fool to simply blame it on a government conspiracy.
And that's the crux of the problem with work such as Hastings' books and articles. While they make for interesting, well-written, deeply-researched tales, they simply cannot hold water as compelling evidence. To his credit, Hastings admits this reliance on anecdotal evidence. Yet, he proceeds with his lectures, books, articles, and a forthcoming press conference to shout to any who will listen that the sky is falling. It is obvious that he has a deeply abiding passion and concern when it comes to the correlation between UFOs and our military installations.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
