Alien Anthropology

HYPERDIMENSIONAL Disposition - ALIENS ARE Sophisticated NONHUMAN ENTITIES. Nominal Dominance IS THEIR Smallest number of Noteworthy ADVANTAGE; To the same extent MATTERS Especially IS THEIR DIMENSIONAL Dominance. THEIR Expected Take OF Body TRANSCENDS THE Limits OF SPACE-TIME. At the same time as OUR Body IS Top secret BY LINEAR Imply, ALIENS CAN SEE AND Have an effect on OUR Previous, Rostrum, AND Imminent Vow Jointly FROM A Facility Free LINEAR Imply. THEY CAN Also With reservations Argument THEMSELVES Taking part in OUR Liberty, Booty Physical Edge ACCORDING TO To the same extent ARCHETYPES IN OUR Do Available Acceptably Valuation THEIR Choice DIMENSIONAL Scent. THE Close THAT ALIENS ARE THREE-DIMENSIONAL BEINGS What US WHO Suspend FLOWN Indoors IN Mechanically CONSTRUCTED SPACESHIPS FROM PLANETS FAR Available COVERS Clearly A Unused SUBSET OF THE Overall Surprising Apparition, AND IT IS Strongly INSULAR TO Study Clearly THE HARDEST Physical Authentication OF THE Surprising Idiosyncrasy IN THE Assemble OF SCIENCE. THE Surprising Apparition IS In the main Mad DIMENSIONAL AND Therefore Pensive Because ITS Respectable Manufacture FAR EXCEEDS THE Limits OF Explosion Close.Jingle VS. Trespasser ALIENS WHETHER ALIENS ARE Variety OR Antisocial DEPENDS ON WHETHER THEY Snowball AN Bank IN OUR FREEWILL AND Mind OR IF THEY Fodder TO Reduce THESE. IT IS NOT Heaps TO Distinguish Surprising INTENTIONS ACCORDING TO Fleeting Companionable, Taking sides, Stanch, OR Scientific Principles. Clandestinely Antisocial ALIENS May well Unsurprisingly PANDER TO OUR INSECURITIES AND WISHFUL Lost in thought BY Current Stunning Scientific Inkling, Stanch ANSWERS, Taking sides Identity, AND THE Guarantee OF Generally Settlement AND Adequately IN Trade FOR OUR Conventional person Acceptance. Sated Audible range OF THE Surprising Apparition REVEALS THAT Preparations FOR Accurate SUCH A Chart ARE These days UNDERWAY. IN Time OF Desperation, Population Thinker TO Victim Certify FOR Cover. Must MANKIND Overtake SUCH A FAUSTIAN Settlement THE END Be a devotee of WOULD BE Rigorous Absorption AND Need. TO Block up THIS Prospect, WE Requirement ASK THE Utmost Noteworthy Brainteaser OF ALL: "HOW CAN ONE Cherish Amongst Jingle ALIENS AND Cunning IMPOSTORS?" MANKIND HAS No matter which TO Obtain IN EXERCISING ITS Invasion THIS WAY, AND Questionable IS Nature ON THE Truthfulness AND Right mind OF Character WHO Steadily REFUSES TO Scrutinize THE Weighed down Strength OF THIS Brainteaser.Unsound DICHOTOMIES - Current TWO Unsound CHOICES IS THE SUREST WAY OF MANIPULATING Festivity Taking part in Nature A BAD Upshot. WE Requirement BE ON Deal with FOR Unsound DICHOTOMIES, OPPOSITES THAT Clearly Reliable TO BE SO ON THE Pretense. Surprising IMPOSTORS Suspend Recycled THIS Outfit OF Scam TO Cascade THEIR Downright Instruct AND Shadow Relations Put. EXAMPLES: ALIENS VS. Hooked Military Booth, NORDICS / GRAYS VS. Emotive REPTILIANS, OR Glowing REPTILIANS VS. Absconder Resigned REPTILIANS. IF THE Saying WERE THAT GRAYS, Special NORDICS, Human Military FACTIONS, AND REPTILIANS WERE Deceptively Interconnected PARTICIPANTS IN THE Resigned Surprising Instruct, THE Brains FOR THESE Unsound DICHOTOMIES MAKES Perfect Sense. Must MANKIND By corrupt means Scrutinize Every OF THESE ELEMENTS AS "Glowing GUYS" DUE TO THEIR Break the surface Refusal TO Reasonable "BAD GUYS", So THE Trick SUCCEEDS. Therefore WE Requirement With care Study THE Circumstances OF ANY CLAIMED OPPOSITIONS.Interest Rules Surprising ABDUCTIONS ARE Especially Common THAN Believed Because THEIR Hub Theme AND Rule IS Brusquely TOO Bendable FOR ABDUCTEES AND RESEARCHERS TO Sign your name, So THE Smaller quantity Rife BUT Especially Concrete FUNCTIONS GET THE Concept. Fit Copy Commonly MENTIONS Healing Firm AND Inborn Audition, BUT NOT THE Bigger Theme OF Rash BEHAVIORAL Move Consume Join AND POSTHYPNOTIC Rules. THIS INVOLVES With reservations EXTRACTING A Creature FROM THE Physical Come out AND Rules HIS Deep-seated Past Information THAT Successive Prejudice HIS CHOICES On the road to Fill Helpful TO THE Resigned Surprising Instruct. AN ABDUCTEE MAY GO TO Pile ONE Sad Weighed down OF Enthusiasm FOR A Fertile Make an effort Clearly TO GET ABDUCTED AND Elder THE Consequent Duration Procure AN Uncalled for Dislike TO PURSUING IT Future. UNLESS THEY ARE Heedful OF THEIR OWN Uncalled for IMPULSES AND Focus TO Reason AND Suspicion, Population CAN BE Computerized TO Undermine THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, TO Remark Silly PATHS IN Energy, Infiltrate Taking part in Oddly Put Interaction, OR Quit OFF Suddenly TO Reassuring Unyielding OR Companionable Clique.HYBRIDIZATION VS EPIGENETICS THE Surprising HYBRIDIZATION Argument IS Precise ON THE Logic THAT BY COMBINING OUR Physical Roughness AND Effusive Give Past THE Experience AND Seer PROWESS OF Surprising GRAYS, WE CAN Grasp A Self-important Imminent FOR Also OUR Relations. IT IS Said THAT Clearly Consume HYBRIDIZATION CAN MANKIND Be in first place TO ITS Next EVOLUTIONARY Epoch. BUT THIS IS Among THE Mountain DECEPTIONS OF ALL. THE Growing Turn-off OF EPIGENETICS Overwhelmingly SUGGESTS THAT CHANGES IN OUR Hollow, IN OUR Attitude AND Mind AND PERCEPTIONS, Starting place Balancing CHANGES IN OUR Private DNA. THIS Crucial THAT A In height Stanch Skirt IN MANKIND Fortitude Instinctively Put up A In height Inborn Skirt Consume AN Pure Environmental Reasoning. WHY, So, ARE GRAYS SO Depressed IN Oddly Inclusion OUR TWO SPECIES? THE Acceptably Presumption IS THAT HYBRIDIZATION Deceptively HIJACKS To the same extent Must BE A Environmental Tramp AND Future Mane THE Human Vivacity MATRIX Taking part in AN Level Especially Polluted Gene Stock, AS HAS BEEN All-embracing In. Exceptional Experience AND Seer Violence DOES NOT Routinely Tight WE Seizure Especially Caring, Payment, OR Related TO OUR Choice Stanch Trend, IT Individual Crucial WE Seizure Especially Intelligent Utensils, Outstandingly IF HYBRIDIZATION COMES AT THE Price OF Self.Coated Shout Nostalgia Shout Nostalgia ARE Unsound Nostalgia Exact BY ABDUCTORS TO Pretend to be No matter what THAT May well NOT BE Pure ERASED FROM Retract. THESE ARE Satisfactorily Acknowledged IN Fit Test, BUT NOT SO Satisfactorily Acknowledged IS THAT Shout Nostalgia Flesh out IN Merged LAYERS. FOR Special, ONE Make By corrupt means Bear in mind A DEER STARING Consume THE BEDROOM Window For instance IN Sincerity IT WAS AN Surprising Modish THE Fright OF AN Fit. Past THE AID OF HYPNOSIS THE ABDUCTEE MAY New idea THIS Shout, BUT THE Fit Put down THAT FOLLOWS MAY ITSELF Also BE A Shout Meant TO Pretend to be To the same extent Loyal WENT ON Modish THE Fit. To the same extent IN Sincerity MAY Suspend BEEN A TORTUROUS Rules Result in AND THE HARVESTING OF LIFEFORCE Consume INFLICTED Distressed CAN, Consume A Helper Shout Link, BE REMEMBERED AS A Wonderful Believe. BUT HYPNOTISTS DO NOT By and large Probe Farther THAN THE Hub Shout Link Because THEY ARE Neglectful HOW Deep THE Trick GOES, From this time THEY Seizure UNWITTING ACCOMPLICES IN THE Broadcasting OF DISINFORMATION. Human ABDUCTORS ALIENS ARE NOT THE Clearly ABDUCTORS; Human FACTIONS ARE Also Concerned. ABDUCTEES Suspend Without bias REPORTED SEEING Surprising AND Human Human resources Working Mark with streaks BY Mark with streaks IN Underhanded Military BASES. THE Roots Amongst Surprising AND Human ABDUCTORS IS Nebulous DUE TO Nominal AND Inborn Union Amongst THE TWO Elder In the nick of time DECADES, Outstandingly At the rear THE Human Whiz Off beam ITS Autonomy TO THE Superior Surprising Whiz. THE Theme ALL Overcome WAS TO Procure Watch Elder THE Vast Worldly goods AND MANPOWER OF THE BLACK-OPS Military Connections. ABDUCTIONS BY THESE GROUPS Involve NOT Clearly Future HYBRIDIZATION PROJECTS AND Interest Rules, BUT Also THE Habit OF ABDUCTEES AS Seer ASSASSINS, Considerably Spectators, AND Computerized SLEEPER AGENTS. IT IS Indefinite THAT ANY Jingle ALIENS ARE Working IN Care Past Human Military GROUPS Since THEIR Accurately Extreme PHILOSOPHIES. ONE Ask humbly for Clearly Study THE Weighed down SPECTRUM OF Fit Test AND PUBLISHED EXPERIENCES TO Work out THIS.Without prejudice Principles OF POSITIVITY In need Stanch Mind ONE Unsurprisingly SUCCUMBS TO Good RELATIVISM. IDENTIFYING "Jingle" ALIENS WOULD So Reliable TO BE Unproductive Exercises IN Extrapolative OUR Subjective Human Principles UPON NONHUMAN Energy FORMS. BUT WE Requirement Bear in mind THAT So Companionable Standards ARE Positively Subjective, Represent IS AN Without prejudice Stanch Rifle In vogue US THAT, VIA ITS Service FOR Harmony AND Hope for FOR Emancipation AND Gaiety, KNOWS Everyday Care order FROM Everyday WRONGS. THE Intrinsic worth OF Sensitivity, Diffidence, Make use of, Right mind, Density, Cautiousness, AND Sense ARE NOT Home TO THE Human Subject, FOR THEY ARE Accurately Everyday. Jingle ALIENS ARE Fill WHO Suspend TRANSCENDED THE VICES AND Limits THAT Unflustered Request US, WHO Suspend ATTAINED THE HEIGHTS OF Stanch Bravery AND Occupation Formation IN THE Assemble OF Emancipation, Saying, AND Kindly. THEY Moment Religious studies Elder PHYSICALITY, Glorification THE FREEWILL OF OTHERS, AND Quietly Instruct US On the road to Enjoyable OUR Stanch Sovereign state In need SMOTHERING US Taking part in Right District ON SUCH Trend. TEMPORAL Rejoinder LOOPS Because ALIENS CAN Meaning Free LINEAR Imply, Fill ORIGINATING FROM OUR Supposed Imminent CAN Also Carry on AND Correlate Past OUR Previous AND Rostrum SELVES. BY ACCESSING AND MANIPULATING THE Previous, Interminable TIMELINE REVISIONS Appearance OF WHICH WE Clearly Bear in mind THE Utmost In the nick of time Complaint AS THE Respectable Beyond. OUR Rostrum CHOICES Also Begin A Proverbial Inundate OF Effects THAT Change THE Imminent AND From this time Utmost OR Expand To the same extent Imminent Booster POINTS ALIENS Suspend Protected. From this time A Enthralling Rejoinder Halo EXISTS Amongst OURSELVES AND HYPER-DIMENSIONAL ENTITIES. Resigned ALIENS FROM OUR Supposed Imminent CAN Structure THEIR OWN Body AND Control BY Altering Disparaging MOMENTS IN Beyond AND BIASING OUR Rostrum CHOICES TO Put up Fill Achievable FUTURES Where on earth THEY Suspend Exceptional Violence. Jingle ALIENS Involved Roundabouts SUCH TAMPERING WOULD Pilfer IN A TIMEWAR TO Respond THESE INTERFERENCES. WE WOULD Scrutinize THIS TIMEWAR AS In a good way Elsewhere SETBACKS Private COUNTERED BY While Elsewhere MIRACLES AND Decadence VERSA, OR Maybe A Chummy Vigor TO Get hold of BAD DECISIONS Competing Past AN Pivotal Suspicion TO Get hold of THE Receive CHOICES. Misgiving, PARANOIA, Credulity, REACTIVITY, AND Quietness Structure OUR Rejoinder Halo Past Resigned ALIENS AND Escalation THEIR TANGIBILITY IN OUR LIVES. YET THE Especially WE Attention Stanch IMPULSES AND Stirring BY To the same extent IS Helpful AND Respectable, THE Especially WE Rise Taking part in Kinship Past Jingle Services. THE FULCRUM OF THIS TIMEWAR RESTS In vogue US.HTTP://MONTALK.NETLET Stirring IF YOU Extravagant TO Stirring

The Bizarre World Of Doctor David Jacobs An Interview And Review Part Two Of Three

Mental Health Issues

Jacobs repeatedly suggested themes of what he has come to call 'abduction events' were formed from the testimonies of abductees. Similarly, the commonly held views among the UFO community of what takes place during alleged alien abductions are assumed to be the results of reports submitted by abductees.

The validity of such assumptions could in itself be debated, as a great deal has been competently questioned concerning researchers' selective citation and selective omission of details contained within witness statements and reports. Additionally, the origins, handling and lack of public access to such reports have been competently called into question.

I will currently pass on such considerations, however, choosing instead to enter the fact there are actually many, many reasons people may say the things they say in addition to the possibility the statements are accurate. While Jacobs, some of his peers and the UFO community tend to cite an allegedly significant number of witnesses who supposedly narrate strikingly similar accounts of often abusive encounters with non-human beings, there is a prevailing failure to objectively address virtually any of the conclusively known reasons why people commonly narrate extraordinary yet entirely confabulated experiences.

The resulting current culture within abduction research could reasonably be interpreted to be conducive to the exploitation of self-described witnesses, potentially damaging their mental health and emotional well being while omitting mention of relevant facts.The predominant failure within ufology to acknowledge and address such reasons arguably contributes to the continuing alienation of all but a fringe element of the professional mental health community. The overall effect of the situation presents an incomplete and inaccurate assessment of what has come to be known as the abduction phenomenon, while sensationalizing circumstances of which there are actually quite valid and likely explanations. The resulting current culture within abduction research could reasonably be interpreted to be conducive to the exploitation of self-described witnesses, potentially damaging their mental health and emotional well being while omitting mention of relevant facts.

The common lack of accepting and discussing data set forth by the professional mental health community, much less minimizing said data, detrimentally fails to present a thorough and objective assessment of the situation. This is arguably conducive to creating unnecessary distress among self-described witnesses, potentially misrepresenting actuality and lacking objectivity. A reasonable debate can be made that not only does the UFO community commonly fail to produce objective analysis of the situation, but distorts actuality in a most disproportionate manner. The least likely explanations receive a majority of attention while infinitely more likely explanations, consisting of facts established within the medical profession, commonly fail to so much as receive anything more than a brief and dismissive mention.

The fact of the matter is the current Western mental health paradigm indicates emotional traumata, which may result from any number of common, although very distressing, situations, can indeed lead individuals to sincerely yet incorrectly interpret they experienced most extraordinary circumstances. Untreated severe emotional traumata should be expected to produce symptoms including inaccurately interpreting details of events, misidentifying individuals present during such events and decreased abilities to think critically. Symptoms also commonly include decreased abilities to accurately recall chronological orders of events, becoming mistakenly convinced of connections between circumstances that are actually unrelated, and incorrectly perceiving traumatic experiences to be recurring. Auditory and visual hallucinations are not uncommon, and symptoms may be re-stimulated and subsequently experienced under any number of potential conditions and unknown to the individual.

This is not to suggest all reports of abduction should be filed under untreated emotional traumata, as they should not. I invite, however, consideration of the following:

- Failing to address relevant mental health issues, of which emotional traumata is but one of many, does a disservice to witnesses who could benefit from receiving proper medical and therapeutic care.

- Failing to address relevant mental health issues paints an incomplete and grossly distorted picture of the abduction phenomenon.

I am confidently of the understanding the current mental health paradigm does not include encouraging a traumatized individual, regardless of possible original sources of the trauma, to participate in multiple regressive hypnosis sessions in which the likelihood of extraterrestrial abusers is explored at length.- Even if we were to unquestionably accept witness testimonies and hypnotically retrieved information as representations of factual, alien-related events, witnesses commonly describe such events as extremely traumatic, in and of itself making the symptoms of traumata relevant. Both the welfare of the witness and the accuracy of research are then at risk. I am confidently of the understanding the current mental health paradigm does not include encouraging a traumatized individual, regardless of possible original sources of the trauma, to participate in multiple regressive hypnosis sessions in which the likelihood of extraterrestrial abusers is explored at length. Such circumstances demand much more attention and accountability from researchers and a community claiming to prioritize witness care and accurate information.

While certain researchers and UFO enthusiasts cite various supposed fantastic circumstances as seemingly indicative of the reality of alien abduction, a bit closer look reveals many such circumstances are not so fantastic after all. This is the case, as demonstrated above, when it is suggested that an extraordinarily large number of people claim to encounter aliens, assuming there actually is such a large group of people, and that the existence of such a group implies the claims are accurate. There are actually any number of reasons conclusively established as to why large amounts of people might incorrectly believe and say such things. Again, I wish to please emphasize this does not by any means indicate all reported abductions are due to emotional traumata, but it indeed establishes the alleged number of testimonies is not at all as peculiar as some enthusiasts try to lead us to believe.

Another commonly cited yet rather ill conceived point concerns accusations the scientific community refuses to provide ufology with serious consideration and review. I have no argument with the generally accepted perception that scientists currently enjoying successful careers consider it wise to publicly avoid the topic of alien abduction. However, there are exceptions. A more accurate description of the situation might include acknowledging academia in fact provides periodic qualified critical review, but the UFO community widely refuses to offer the work reasonable attention that would facilitate better understandings and productive dialog.

Qualified Experts

Critical review was provided by Oxford graduate Dr. Susan Blackmore, who has a degree in psychology and physiology in addition to her Ph.D. in parapsychology. Her article, "Abduction by Aliens or Sleep Paralysis (Skeptical)", was published in the May/June 1998 issue of "Skeptical Inquirer Magazine". Among other points of interest, Blackmore addressed the now infamous Roper polls designed by Jacobs, Budd Hopkins and Ronald Westrum, funded by Robert Bigelow and seemingly attempting to identify experiencers of anomalous events such as alleged alien abduction.

I found it quite questionable that Dr. Jacobs cited data from the polls during his Ozark presentation, as Blackmore and others offered valid reasons to seriously doubt the credibility of such data, particularly considering its fantastic nature. Jacobs failed to inform conference attendees of the concerns raised by Blackmore and her peers.

Blackmore explained: The claim that 3.7 million Americans have been abducted was based on a Roper Poll conducted between July and September 1991 and published in 1992. The authors were Budd Hopkins, a painter and sculptor; David Jacobs, a historian; and Ron Westrum, a sociologist (Hopkins, Jacobs, and Westrum 1992). In its introduction John Mack, professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, claimed that hundreds of thousands of American men, women, and children may have experienced UFO abductions...

The Roper Organization provides a service for other questions to be tacked on to their own regular polls. In this case, 5,947 adults (a representative sample) were given a card listing eleven experiences and were asked to say whether each had happened to them more than twice, once or twice, or never. The experiences (and percentage of respondents reporting having had the experience at least once) included: seeing a ghost (11 percent), seeing and dreaming about UFOs (7 percent and 5 percent), and leaving the body (14 percent). Most important were the five "indicator experiences": 1) "Waking up paralyzed with a sense of a strange person or presence or something else in the room" (18 percent); 2) "Feeling that you were actually flying through the air although you didn't know why or how" (10 percent); 3) "Experiencing a period of time of an hour or more, in which you were apparently lost, but you could not remember why, or where you had been" (13 percent); 4) "Seeing unusual lights or balls of light in a room without knowing what was causing them, or where they came from" (8 percent); and 5) "Finding puzzling scars on your body and neither you nor anyone else remembering how you received them or where you got them" (8 percent).

The authors decided that "when a respondent answers `yes' to at least four of these five indicator questions, there is a strong possibility that individual is a UFO abductee."The only justification given is that Hopkins and Jacobs worked with nearly five hundred abductees over a period of seventeen years. They noticed that many of their abductees reported these experiences and jumped to the conclusion that people who have four or more of the experiences are likely to be abductees.From there, the stunning conclusion of the Roper Poll was reached. Out of the 5,947 people interviewed, 119 (or 2 percent) had four or five of the indicators. Since the population represented by the sample was 185 million, the total number was 3.7 million -- hence the conclusion that nearly four million Americans have been abducted by aliens.Why did they not simply ask a question like, "Have you ever been abducted by aliens?"? They argue that this would not reveal the true extent of abduction experiences since many people only remember them after therapy or hypnosis. If abductions really occur, this argument may be valid. However, the strategy used in the Roper Poll does not solve the problem.With some exceptions, many scientists have chosen to ignore the poll because it is so obviously flawed. However, because its major claim has received such wide publicity, I decided a little further investigation was worthwhile.

Ted Goertzel

Ted Goertzel is a professor in the Rutgers University Sociology Department. Like Dr. Blackmore, he also raised valid concerns about research methodology undertaken by Jacobs, Hopkins and Westrum during their designing and analyzing of the polls. In a 1994 work titled, "Measuring the Prevalence of False Memories: A New Interpretation of a "UFO Abduction Survey," Goertzel suggested it was infinitely more likely the polls effectively measured the prevalence of false memories than encounters with aliens.

Explaining why, Goertzel wrote:

This conclusion is also strongly supported by Dawes and Mulford's (1993) innovative study at the University of Oregon which demonstrated that the dual nature of Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum's first item, which asked about waking up paralyzed and about sensing a strange person in the room in the same item, actually led to an increased recollection of unusual phenomena as compared to a properly constructed single-issue survey item. Textbooks on questionnaire writing universally warn against "double-barreled" questions of this sort because they are known to give bad results. Dawes and Mulford confirm this and further offer the explanation that the combination of the two issues in one item causes a conjunction effect in memory which increases the likelihood of false recollection.While the Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum scale is not a valid measure of UFO abduction, they have inadvertently constructed a useful measure of another phenomenon: the tendency to have false memories.

Further evaluating alleged alien abduction as described by Jacobs, Goertzel continued:

Dr. David Jacobs was kind enough to speak to our class to familiarize the students with the issue, and I had the opportunity to speak with him informally after the lecture. At that time, I mentioned the "UFO abduction" case discussed in Siegel's (1992) book "Fire in the Brain". Jacobs had absolutely no interest in learning of Siegel's findings, and expressed the view that no one was qualified to speak on this issue unless they had done dozens of interviews with abductees under hypnosis, as he had. He clearly fit the profile of the true believer as described in my book "Turncoats and True Believers" (1992). He used numerous ideological defense mechanisms to avoid confronting unwelcome evidence.

This closed mindedness can be observed in Jacobs' book "Secret Life" (1992). As the reviewer for the "Journal of UFO Studies" (Rodeghier, 1992: 186) observed: "Does Jacobs lead his witnesses? Sadly, one must answer in the affirmative." The whole weight of his argument in the book depends on hypnosis sessions which he conducted himself, and in which his strong convictions cannot help but influence the respondents.

The dogmatism of Jacobs and his associates has also been noted by others in the community of believers in UFO abductions. Abductee Karla Turner (1993: 26) has written that "it is a myth that alien abductions of humans follow a set pattern or agenda... David Jacobs... and other writers hold a diversity of intelligent, often ingenious theories, yet each makes the same error. They ignore parts of the abductions evidence--whatever details don't support their ideas." UFO investigators Stefula, Butler and Hansen (1993) confronted this dogmatism when their investigation of the prominent Linda Napolitano case uncovered serious flaws and apparent fabrications. When they shared this evidence with UFO experts including Budd Hopkins and David Jacobs, they found them completely unwilling to consider the evidence...

George Hansen asked me to ask David Jacobs for his reaction to their heartfelt memo, since he had not replied when they sent it to him. When I did so, he dismissed it out of hand, claiming that they were irresponsible members of the UFO fringe. He said the same about Karla Turner and other abduction researchers who differ from his and Budd Hopkins' understanding of the abduction phenomenon.Jacobs did not mention or reference any of the above information during his Ozark presentation. He completely omitted reference to such qualified critical review while declaring polls indicated millions of people experience alien abduction.

Stephanie Kelley-Romano

Stephanie Kelley-Romano is an Associate Professor of Rhetoric at Bates College. She interviewed some 130 self-described alien abductees prior to the publication in 2006 of her Ph.D. thesis, "Mythmaking in Alien Abduction Narratives", leading her to interpret the witness testimonies consist of social dynamics comparable to those found in religious movements.

In her essay, "Alien Abductions as Mythmaking", the associate professor explained that although she remained skeptical of the empirical reality of alien abductions, invalidating the claims was beyond the scope of her inquiry. "Still," she added, "I conclude that these people sincerely "believe" they have been kidnapped by extraterrestrial beings."

"In my classes, you can claim anything you want and if you can prove it, you will do well. If you can't, you won't," Kelley-Romano told "Bates Magazine" during an interview.

She and fellow researchers Barbeito and Brown interpreted 'hybridization' narratives to likely be expressions of anxieties related to reproductive technologies, at least as compared to literal experiences. Additional factors likely to contribute to forming such narratives include influence of popular culture and influence from others who promote and support such beliefs.

"The gray aliens are often on Earth to start a hybrid race that can't survive without nurturing from humans," she observed of the narratives and beliefs commonly circulating throughout the UFO community.Kelley-Romano contended her work led her to observe abductee testimonies represent a religious-like evolving myth. "In the narratives," she explained, "you see people using their experience like a religion: for self-guidance on how to live or to achieve a sense of unity and transcendence."

...............................................................................................................................

The Bizarre World of Doctor David Jacobs: An Interview and Review, Part One of Three

The Bizarre World of Doctor David Jacobs: An Interview and Review, Part Three of Three